by Ivan Israelstam | Oct 22, 2016 | CCMA, Labour Law, Labour Law for Employers
Double Jeopardy occurs where an employee is punished twice for the same incident of misconduct or poor performance. Normally, such discipline would be found to be unfair. However, one view is that a second disciplinary process might be justified if the employer is...
by Ivan Israelstam | Oct 22, 2016 | CCMA, Labour Law, Labour Law Debate with Ivan Israelstam, Labour Law for Employers
At a hearing arranged to discipline an employee both parties are entitled bring witnesses. These witnesses may come from inside or outside the workplace. The accused employee has the right to cross-examine the witnesses brought by the employer. The employer is not...
by Ivan Israelstam | Oct 8, 2016 | CCMA, Corporate, Labour Law for Employers
It may well continue without you. Where the employer fails to attend an arbitration hearing the arbitrator is entitled to continue without the employer unless the arbitrator is aware of an acceptable reason for the employer’s absence. As it is difficult, in the...
by Ivan Israelstam | Aug 30, 2016 | Employees, Labour Law, Labour Law Debate with Ivan Israelstam, Labour Law for Employers
The Code of Good Practice: Dismissal provides that, where employers are considering dismissing an employee they should be able to justify this drastic sanction by proving that the employee’s misconduct is so serious that it makes continued employment intolerable. One...
by Ivan Israelstam | Aug 28, 2016 | Labour Law, Labour Law for Employers
Sex related acts not always sexual harassment In the case of Maepe vs Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration & another (CLL Vol. 17 June 2008) a senior commissioner at the CCMA was brought to a disciplinary hearing on charges of sexual harassment...
